Professor Responsável: Rafael Duarte Villa e Mônica Herz

Objetivos:

A disciplina das relações internacionais tem sido uma das que mais se sofisticaram do ponto de vista teórico-metodológico nos últimos vinte anos. E o campo da segurança internacional acompanhou essa sofisticação e modernização dentre das sub-áreas da política internacional. Novas temáticas sejam elas de natureza sociológica, de direitos humanos ou de ordem metodológico e ontológico foram acrescidas a enfoques tradicionais baseadas no poder e nos interesses dos Estados. Esta disciplina discute as continuidades e pressões que se operaram na noção de segurança internacional e como esse campo se problematizou com a introdução de novos temas, novos atores e novos enfoques teórico-metodológicos. Assim os objetivos da disciplina são:

1. Familiarizar estudantes de pós-graduação com alguns dos temas mais relevantes do campo da segurança internacional, inclusive os temas tradicionais
2. Introduzir e discutir as orientações teóricas que tem norteado os debates no campo da segurança internacional
3. Mostrar e discutir os principais processos e atores em curso no campo da segurança internacional
4. Discutir uma bibliografia relevante e atualizada dos estudos contemporâneos de segurança internacional

Formas de Avaliação:

A avaliação consistira de duas resenhas (30% da nota) sobre textos selecionados do programa,e um trabalho final (70% da nota).

Metodologia:

Aulas expositivas e seminários dirigidos.

Parte I: Estudos estratégicos em segurança internacional

Dilema de segurança: velhos e novas leituras

Booth, Ken & Wheeler, Nicholas . (2008) The security dilemma: fear, cooperation and trust in world politics: New York: Palgrave. Introdução e parte I

Jervis, Robert. (1978) “Cooperation under Security Dilemma”, World Politics, 30 (2), pp. 167-314.

Herz, J. H. “Idealist internationalism and the security dilemma”. World Politics, 2: (1950), p 157-180

2. O mecanismo tradicional da segurança: a balança de poder

Glaser, C. & Chaim, K. (2004).What is the offense-defense balance and can we measure it? In, Offense, defense and war. Brown, M; Coté, O; Lynn-Jones, S; Miller, (eds.)) Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press

Schweller, R. (1995). “ Bandwagoning for profit: bringing the revisionist state back in” , in , The perils of the anarchy. Brown, M; Lynn-Jones, S; Miller, S (eds.). Cambridge: MIT Press

Walt, S. (1990). The origins of the alliances. Ithaca and London: Cornell and London, pp. 17-49; 147-286.

Terrific, Terry et al. Security studies today. United Kingdom, Polity Press. 1999, Cap 1: “International relations and securities studies”.

Parte II: A ampliação do quadro conceitual da segurança internacional: Instituições e enfoques críticos

1. Instituições: como importam na segurança internacional

Haftendorn, H; Keohane, R,. & Wallander , C. (1999) “risk, threat and security institutions”, in: Haftendorn, H, Keohane, R,. & Wallander , C. (eds.) . Imperfects unions: security institutions over time and space. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Jepperson, Wend, A & Katzenstein, P. (1996). “Norms, identity and culture in national

security. in Katzenstein, P (ed.) The culture of national security. Norms and identity inNew York:Columbia University Press.

Jervis, Robert. (1982) “Security Regimes”, International Organization, 36(2), pp. 173-194.

2. Instituições tradicionais de segurança: Cooperação e segurança coletiva

Jervis, Robert. “From balance to the concert”. A study of the international security cooperation”, World Politics 38(1), (October, 1985): 58-69.

Kupchan, Ch. & Kupchan, C. (1998) “Promise of collective security”, in, Brown, Michael et al. Theories of war and peace. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press, 1998. Part Iv International institutions, war and peace, in, Brown, Michael et al. Theories of war and peace. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.

3. Normas, confianças e segurança : Um estudo de caso: Latino-América

Booth, Ken & Wheeler, Nicholas . (2008) The security dilemma: fear, cooperation and trust in world politics: New York: Palgrave. Caps. 4 e 9.

Holsti, K. J. (1997). Normas. The state, war and the state of the war. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press. Cap. 8: “Analyzing an anomaly: war, peace and the state in South America” .

Herz, Monica. (2009). “Building trust in Latin America”, in. The United stets and Europe in a changing world. Kanet, R. E. (ed.). Danver (USA): Dordrecht.

Jepperson, Wend, A & Katzenstein, P. (1996). “Norms, identity and culture in national

security. in Katzenstein, P (ed.) The culture of national security. Norms and identity inNew York: Columbia University Press.

Kacowicz, A. The impact of norms in international society: the Latin America experience, 1881-2001. Notre Dame (Indiana): University of Notre Dame Press. Caps: 1 a 5.

Martin, L. “ Institutions and cooperation: sanctions during the Falkland islands conflicts”, in , The perils of the anarchy. Brown, M; Lynn-Jones, S; Miller, S (eds.). Cambridge: MIT Press.

4. Paz democrática e comunidades de segurança. Um estudo de caso: Latino-américa (2 aulas)

Adler, Emanuel & Barnet, Michael. (1998) “A framework for the study of security communities”, in: Adler, Emanuel & Barnet, Michael (eds.) Security Communities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,. Caps 1 e 2, “Security communities in theoretical perspective”; “A framework for the study of security communities.

Domíngues, J. “Security, peace and democracy in Latin America and teh Caribbean. Challenges for the post-cold war era”, in: Domíngues J. (ed.) Pittsburg: Pittsburg University Press.

Cepik, M. (2009) Regional security and integration in South America: what UNASUR could learn from the OSCE and the Shangai Cooperation Organization”, , in. The United stets and Europe in a changing world. Kanet, R. E. (ed.). Danver (USA): Dordrecht.

Doyle, Michael. (1986) “Liberalism and world politics”, American Political Science Review, pp. 1151-1169, Jstor

Hurrel, Andrew. (1998)“An emerging security community: in South America? in: Adler, Emanuel & Barnet, Michael (eds.) Security Communities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hirst, Monica. “Security policies: democratization and regional integration”, in, Latin America and the Caribbean in the post-cold war era: International security and democracy. Domíngues J. (ed.) Pittsburg: Pittsburg University Press.

Russet, B & Oneal, J. (2001). Triangulating peace. Democracy, interdependence and international organizations. New York & London, Norton & Company. Cap 2.

Layne, Christopher. (1998). “Kant o Cant: The myth of the democratic peace”, in, Brown, Michael et al. Theories of war and peace. Cambridge, Massachusetts: in, Brown, Michael et al. Theories of war and peace. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.

5.1 A Escola de Copenhagen e os estudos sobre a securitzação

Buzan, B., Waever, O. & Wilde, J. Security: A New Framework for Analysis. United Kingdom: Lynne Rienner Roland Publishers, 1998. Cap “Security analysis: conceptual apparatus”.

Buzan, B., Waever, O. 2003. Regions and Power. The Structure of International Security. Cambridge University Press, 2003. Cap 3: “security complexes: a theory of regional security”

Buzan, Barry and Waever, Ole (2009) Macrosecuritization and security constellations: reconsidering scale in securitization theory. Review of international studies, 35 (2). pp. 253-276.

Knudsen, Olay. Post-Copenhagen Security Studies. Desecuritizing the securitization”, Security Dialogues, 32(3), 2003, pp. 355-358.

5. 2 Critical Security Studies (SSC)

Booth, K. (2007). Theory of world security. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p. 95-181.

Booth, K. “Critical exploration” (2004), in, Booth, Ken (ed.) Critical Security Studies and World Politics. London: Lynner Rienner.

Smith, Steve. (2004). “The contested concept of security”, in, Booth, Ken (ed.) Critical Security

Studies and World Politics. London: Lynner Rienner, 2004.

Linklater A (2004). “Political community and human security”. In: Booth, Ken (ed.). Critical Security Studies and World Politics. London: Lynner Rienner. pp. 113-130.

Parte III - Quatro processos contemporâneos relevantes em estudos de segurança internacional

1. Poderes nucleares emergentes: entre o otimismo e o pessimismo

Braum, Chaim and Christopher, Chyba. “Proliferation rings: new challenges to the New proliferations regimes”, International Security, 29(2), 2002, p. 5-49.

Karl, David. “Proliferation pessimism and emerging nuclear powers”, International Security, 2(3), 1996-1997, pp. 87-119.

Sagan, Scott (1995) More will be worse”, in, Sagan, S. D. & Waltz K. The spread of nuclear weapons: a debate New York /London: W.W Norton.

Sagan, Scot D. “Why do states build nuclear weapons? Three models in search of a bomb”. In, Brown, Michael E. et al. (orgs) New global dangers . Changing dimensions of international security

Waltz, Kenneth (1995) “More may be better”, in, Sagan, S. D. & Waltz K. The spread of nuclear weapons: a debate New York /London: W.W Norton.

2. Intervenção humanitária, Peacekeepings  e soberania no mundo contemporâneo

Doyle, M & Sambanis, N. (2006). Making war & building peace. Princenton: Princeton University Press. Caps 2 e 3.

Keohane, Robert. (2007) “Political authority after intervention: gradations in sovereignty”, in: Holzgrefe, J.L & Keohane, R (eds.) . Humanitarian intervention: etical, legal and political dilemmas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kratochwil, F. “sovereignty as dominium: is there a right of humanitarian intervention? in: Beyond Wesphalia? States, sovereignty and international intervention. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press. 

Lindley, D. (2007). Promoting peace with information. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press. Caps: 1, 6 e 7. 

Weiss, T & Chopra, J. (1995). “Sovereignty under siege: from intervention to humanitarian space”, in: Beyond Wesphalia? States, sovereignty and international intervention. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press. 

3. Atores não estatais fora da lei: o caso terrorismo

Booth, Ken . (2002). “World in collisions. Booth, Ken & Dunne, Tim (eds.). Worlds in Collision: Terror and the Future of Global Order. New York: Palgrave.

Freedman, Lawrence. (2002) “New type of war”, Booth, Ken & Dunne, Tim (eds.). (2002).. Worlds in Collision: Terror and the Future of Global Order. New York: Palgrave.

Cronin, A. K. (2004). “Behind the curve: globalization and international terrorism” , in, New global dangers . Brown, M; Coté , O; Lynn-Jones, S. & Miller, S. . (orgs) Changing dimensions of international security. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Kydd, Andrrew and Walter, Barbara. “The strategies of the terrorism”, International Security, 31 (1), (summer, 2006), pp. 49-80.

4. A privatização da segurança internacional: companhias militares privadas

Arevalo, Javier R. “Contratistas civiles en operaciones expedicionarias. Problemas de seguridad y control para el mando militar”, Athena Intelligence Jornal, 3 (1): (febrero, 2008). 13-38.

Cohen, M. & Maria. Kupçu. (2005). “Privatizing foreign policy”, World Policy Journal, Fall, 2005: 34-51.

Holmqvist, Caroline. (2005). “Private security companies: a case for regulation, SIPRI (policy paper, no. 9), (January, 2005).

Singer, P. W. (2004) Corporate warriors: the rise of the privatized military industry and its ramifications for international security”, in, Brown, M; Coté , O; Lynn-Jones, S. & Miller, S. (Orgs) New global dangers . Changing dimensions of international security. Cambridge: MIT Press.